Ldbenney, there's a basic pattern for every kind of citation that kicks in here. 7,487,109, citing Aztalan Cemetery, Milford, Jefferson County, Wisconsin the accompanying photographs by Mike and Kari Waterbury are materially informative, but do not provide a legible image of the inscribed data.
Esselstyn (1861 – 1862), Find A Grave Memorial no. For sites that offer both a database and images, when we cite a specific item it is best to indicate whether we are referring to the image or to the database entry.Īll points considered, EE's version of your citation might be this:įind A Grave, database and images ( : accessed 14 March 2011), memorial page for Claudia J.
Find a grave website how to#
(You do know how to pick a doozy of an example!)ģ. For the tombstone itself, the images are virtually unreadable. The photographs are contributed by two different individuals, one of whom is identified solely by first name. In the case of your example, the creator of the page and contributor of the data is pseudonymous and identified as inactive, with no contact info. Whether that information is retained at publication time will depend upon editorial or publishing policy and, occasionally, some other considerations. If the photographer or contributor is identified, then Yes, we would typically include that person (and his/her contact information, if available) in our working citation. Because the site title is self-identifying and well known, we do not have to repeat that identifier in both the author and title fields of our citation.Ģ. Yes, the title should be italicized, just as we do for books, journals, and other similar publications. Find A Grave is the title of the website. Find A Grave is the name of the organization that created the site. You've done a very good job of grasping the issues at EE 5.16's model for citing online sources of grave-marker data.
0 kommentar(er)
